Thursday, March 29, 2007
Britney Spears issue
i think her drug addiction end her marriage life because your life patner espacially husband want more attention and what you to a good mother of his children and a best life patner...with alot of caring, love and also a great teacher. i don't think so any of tehse thing's britney has in her.... she's cleberity with alot of money...parting ...and enjoying life with drugs and also allways want to be in headlines....all these things enver help girl or woman to handle there life.
china's birth control issue
i think in china it's really necessary to controle over population. we know that china has world's largest population....China government not just put the law in the front of people also educate the people about the population increasing rate...and the lack of resources..this may help government...
feedback on march 27th class...
i think if i am a judge o the case..i basically punish all three officers not just one...but first listen to teh case very carefully....every oen knoe that it's hard yo being a police man...and do tehre jobs.... and i think it'x not because of race that teh police man shoot how many times...it's just the time...because we know that it's not easy to do so...
Monday, March 26, 2007
elections 2008
okkk... i think that i'll go with the person with more experience and with more experience ...not with race or gender.....i think i;ll go with clienton bcoz she is good in every thing.... yaa i know that she voted for the war but the face of war know changed...itz not like the past...so, let's wait and watch till end
Wednesday, March 21, 2007
feedback on tuesday's class
some of the fairy tales teach aa good lesson like never quite in your life, love the person not the physical look, and allways trust on god etc. but some of teh fairy tales are just for the fun and reading don't teach kids much but when we got older and older we get alot from the fairy tales. i think yes, fairy tales teah a moral. Secondly, i think organizers keep some bad singers and issues on the reality shows
to made that show more popular and intresting. I think in every show thay have there own propoganda.
to made that show more popular and intresting. I think in every show thay have there own propoganda.
Monday, March 19, 2007
Spring Reading
this spring break i am done with noval "CATCH ME IF YOU CAN" it's a real story about a boy of 16 years Frank Willian become a fake pilot and even FBI never follow him. he trick FBI three times and he went as a pilot of Pan. Am through out the world and cash fake checks. and spend approx one year in jail in europe. It's not intresting in the begning but after 2nd chapter it become more and more intresting and i finished this book in one day.
Thursday, March 8, 2007
wht i wanna be???
I wanna be a Doctor...and latter wanan join the HUMAN RIGHTS ...during my biology year i wannna do my one semester abroad specialy in ENGLAND. and also wanna do summer smester in INDIA and i wanna work with teh really goos doctors of teh world for e.g. i wanna work with Dr. RANDHAWA he's teh first eye specialist in Asia did a laser operation of eye. and i am going to interview Dr. humphere. the chem prof. he majored in Biology and now a Chem. prof. and wanna go in Med. School in New York or New Jersey...and also want to help poor people who cannot afford the medication . and wanna ttravel around teh work. and wana know different people.
Women and children in the today's world
i today's world still we have diffrences between in men and women in diffrent fields of job's for e.g. like basically girls wanna be teachers and mostly men are work where is morehard work and stuff. i think we all know about all this. let's turn towords the middle east...what do u think is teh world is same there or not....i think we all know the answer is no. there women allways work at home...lived with the husband had more than one wife...never cross teh school and don't know how to wright and read. just know how to manage house. and children are allways under the treat of father...where hav eto follow what teh dad sid...no choice at all...have to involed in arrange marraige.
i think women and men never ever gonna get the same status in the rest of the world...women are only safe in USA CANADA and EUROPE.
i think women and men never ever gonna get the same status in the rest of the world...women are only safe in USA CANADA and EUROPE.
Tuesday, March 6, 2007
BNP Humour...
The Truth...
BNP and Islamaphobia
Muslims are now the main victims of BNP racism. Since September 11th was revealed to be the work of Islamic terrorists, Muslims in this country have taken the brunt of abuse by those wanting to exploit tragedy.
All ethnic groups exist as a target for the BNP, but their choice of victim is cynical: “We reject both pro-Zionist internationalism… and the Islamification of our homelands. Which enemy is it in our political interest to be seen to be opposing more vigorously at the moment? To a party aiming to win seats in London, the West Midlands and the former mill-towns of Northern England, the answer should be pretty obvious”.
It is clear then, that the BNP see racism against Muslims as a vote winner. Muslims are an easy target for fascists. This is why the BNP cowardly singles them out for abuse. Under British law, Muslims do not exist as an ethnic group, and so technically cannot be the victims of discrimination. In other words, the BNP can goad Muslims and get away with it. This is why the BNP was campaigning against Muslims long before the New York attacks.
The BNP claim that it is not Asians but only Muslims they have a problem with. This is not true. ‘Muslim’ is often used as a codeword for ‘Asian’ precisely because of gaps in the law.
Nick Griffin pretended that he was not blaming ordinary Muslims, but expressed horror when Tony Blair pushed the same message. “Blair and Bush lie about Islam”, Griffin declared, claiming that is was an attempt by Blair to “Curry favour with Britain’s three million angry Muslims”.
Ordinary Asians in Bradford and Oldham are placed in the same category as those terrorists who flew planes into the World Trade Centre. “The question of whether or not our land will remain ours will be decided not in the mountains of Afghanistan, but in towns like Oldham and Burnley. Anyone who finds that hard to believe needs only to read the Koran to understand why”.
By getting support from Muslim haters in other ethnic groups, the BNP are fostering more division and race hate. These Sikh and Hindu BNP supporters represent only a handful of fanatics. They speak for noone but themselves.
As far back as 1996, the BNP were attacking Muslims as being separate from other ethnic groups. Then members were active in campaigns against the opening of mosques in east and south London. They wrote at the time, “The BNP has no objection to Muslims having their own places of worship – providing they are in Muslim countries and not in Britain”.
The BNP has recently claimed that Al-Qia’da is the true form of Islam and that moderate Muslims who want to live peacefully with other religions are non-believers. This is clear incitement and distortion.
Most of all, Griffin’s anti-Muslim stance is hypocrisy. In the mid-1980s when he was a leading officer in the National Front he openly cavorted with Islamic extremists. He supported the Ayatollah Khomeini’s fundamentalist regime in Iran, and sought backing from Libya’s Colonel Gaddafi
*********
BNP and Islamaphobia
Muslims are now the main victims of BNP racism. Since September 11th was revealed to be the work of Islamic terrorists, Muslims in this country have taken the brunt of abuse by those wanting to exploit tragedy.
All ethnic groups exist as a target for the BNP, but their choice of victim is cynical: “We reject both pro-Zionist internationalism… and the Islamification of our homelands. Which enemy is it in our political interest to be seen to be opposing more vigorously at the moment? To a party aiming to win seats in London, the West Midlands and the former mill-towns of Northern England, the answer should be pretty obvious”.
It is clear then, that the BNP see racism against Muslims as a vote winner. Muslims are an easy target for fascists. This is why the BNP cowardly singles them out for abuse. Under British law, Muslims do not exist as an ethnic group, and so technically cannot be the victims of discrimination. In other words, the BNP can goad Muslims and get away with it. This is why the BNP was campaigning against Muslims long before the New York attacks.
The BNP claim that it is not Asians but only Muslims they have a problem with. This is not true. ‘Muslim’ is often used as a codeword for ‘Asian’ precisely because of gaps in the law.
Nick Griffin pretended that he was not blaming ordinary Muslims, but expressed horror when Tony Blair pushed the same message. “Blair and Bush lie about Islam”, Griffin declared, claiming that is was an attempt by Blair to “Curry favour with Britain’s three million angry Muslims”.
Ordinary Asians in Bradford and Oldham are placed in the same category as those terrorists who flew planes into the World Trade Centre. “The question of whether or not our land will remain ours will be decided not in the mountains of Afghanistan, but in towns like Oldham and Burnley. Anyone who finds that hard to believe needs only to read the Koran to understand why”.
By getting support from Muslim haters in other ethnic groups, the BNP are fostering more division and race hate. These Sikh and Hindu BNP supporters represent only a handful of fanatics. They speak for noone but themselves.
As far back as 1996, the BNP were attacking Muslims as being separate from other ethnic groups. Then members were active in campaigns against the opening of mosques in east and south London. They wrote at the time, “The BNP has no objection to Muslims having their own places of worship – providing they are in Muslim countries and not in Britain”.
The BNP has recently claimed that Al-Qia’da is the true form of Islam and that moderate Muslims who want to live peacefully with other religions are non-believers. This is clear incitement and distortion.
Most of all, Griffin’s anti-Muslim stance is hypocrisy. In the mid-1980s when he was a leading officer in the National Front he openly cavorted with Islamic extremists. He supported the Ayatollah Khomeini’s fundamentalist regime in Iran, and sought backing from Libya’s Colonel Gaddafi
*********
Thursday, March 1, 2007
what really the kite runnet explains????
i know it'z hard to imagine about the Afganistan that wht it is now......first i thought taht it's really mean taht we interfear in matters of Afganistan ......now i think Bush did alot for the people of afganistan...we can't gave them tehre lives or there loved one's back to them but the only thing we do is we help them with money and pray for there lives....i hope one day they get tehre good lives ....and HAZARAs get there workk and reputation back....
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)